Y0ut1n9 S.
1/5
I wish I had read all the negative reviews on Google before paying for Vilcol Limited's services. 21.11.2024 I filled in a form via their website for the "in-depth employment trace". I provided the subject's name, date of birth, and an address from 2019. I promptly received an email stating they would be in touch as soon as possible. However, the communication then went silent for five days.
26.11.2024, I received an email containing an invoice for £55 + VAT, marked "work performed, means success." After transferring the payment to Vilcol, I called Vilcol to question the invoice amount, as it differed from what was indicated on the website. I was concerned there might be an issue with the search. Derek confirmed that nothing was wrong and said I was lucky that they had quoted me an old price. That same afternoon, I received a report containing ONLY information found from Company House. Basically, the subject registered a company on the Company House in Feb 2024 and appointed himself as a director, with no other people or any records uploaded. I had already found this information from Company House and visited the registered office address in the summer of 2024, confirming that the address was invalid. Hence, I was willing to spend money on Vilcol to look into this issue for me. Upon reading the report, I sent an email to the customer care team to express my dissatisfaction. I never heard back from Vilcol.
27.11.2024 at 2:00 pm, I rang Vilcol and asked for Derek. I explained that the information was incorrect and that the report I requested was an "in-depth employment trace" as stated on the form and confirmation email. I expected to see the subject's employment trace, not just information from Company House. Derek responded that they would only provide the current employment status, which was a director of a new company. I explained to Derek that I had visited the address and confirmed it was unrelated to this company. It is a new company that was registered by the subject, and he appointed himself as a director. There are no other people or files for this company. Derek replied that this was all they could find. Derek then advised me to pay another £55 + VAT for a residential address trace if I wanted to find the subject. When I asked about the "no trace, no fee" policy, Derek stated that finding information from Company House constituted a successful trace. The call ended abruptly, and Derek never called back. On the same day afternoon, I emailed the Customer Care Team again to keep them posted on the conversation between me and Derek.
28.11.2024, I received an email from the same Derek, who is also to be the Customer Service Manager. They refused to do a refund, instead, they were happy to offer another £55 + VAT to do a residual trace of the same subject.
However, I still don’t agree that Vilcol has provided reasonable care and skill when they provided this service. The disagreement is based on:
1. I was not lucky to be invoiced an old price – this was Vilcol’s intention. They did not find any useful information other than a new company on the Company House; therefore, they reduced the cost without any communication or invoicing me. This is very unprofessional and dishonest. When I was filling in the “in-depth employment trace” form, I provided all confidential information about myself, such as my phone number, my address, my name, my email address etc. I was hoping to receive integrity and professional service from a private investigation agency.
2. The nature of the Vilcol business is “investigation activities”, I am not happy with paying £66 for a search on the Company House. When people pay for a service for an investigation agent, they would expect to see in-depth results as the service they offer is called “in-depth employment trace”.
The Customer Rights Act 2015 says that services must be provided with reasonable care and skill. In my opinion, Vilcol failed to do so.