Matthew D. L. P.
1/5
After finding the property to rent in Pulborough, we immediately came up against C&W's archaic system of having to "bid" for a rental... something soon to be outlawed I believe. We were keen on the property, so we naturally overpaid, but that was only the start of the horrendous experience, and perhaps the least depressing.
During the tenancy there were a number of occasions where we reported maintenance issues to the C&W, notably concerns with the dated single glazed windows and their deteriorating frames, but nothing was done. The only time maintenance was actually carried out was a leak affecting their Pulborough branch downstairs.
Then it came to the end of the tenancy, we had decided to purchase a house so it was time to leave and we supplied our 2 months notice. This is when the REAL issues started...
Firstly, there was no effort from the agents to attempt to relist the property for a months time, even though we had repeatedly said we were comfortable leaving within a month. However, I know contractually we were obliged to pay the last two months rent so we can't complain too much here, but some pragmatism from C&W would have been appreciated.
Secondly, we officially moved out of the property in May 2025 and you will see from this post it is now almost September. The reason for the delay in reviewing was that it took nearly 4 months to get our security deposit back following a TDS (Tenancy Deposit Scheme) adjudication. Of course, that is due to TDS's adjudication timelines but the fact that TDS were even required to assess this case was beyond belief.
To be forthcoming, the property was a 70s/80s build flat/maisonette that had seen better days. It was in an acceptable condition when we moved in but tired, not professionally cleaned ('fair domestic standard') with visible wear and tear throughout. This was all recorded in the independent check-in report, along with an extensive array of photos detailing the imperfections. Most notable of these was the cheap, stained, lifting (and iron burnt) carpet that could have been there for 10/15 years+ by the looks of it. However, we were happy to move in as it was certainly habitable, just not perfect.
On leaving the property in May an independent report was conducted detailing all of the imperfections and other minor wear and tear from a 1.5 year tenancy. To be candid, we did not have the property professionally cleaned which is atypical, though given the property was not professionally cleaned on arrival we stressed (and stated by TDA) that betterment of the property was not our reasonability, so we cleaned the property to a 'good domestic standard'. There was a special clause in the contract for professional cleaning, but this is in fact illegal under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.
Overall, we weren't surprised by anything in the check-out report as we had left the property in a good condition so innocently expected we'd get our security deposit in a week or two... this was not the case. After weeks for having to hassle C&W (and them replying with some seriously incorrect rights of the delay to deposit return) the they relayed a schedule of damages drawn-up by the landlord accumulating to £1702. Naturally, we were instantly shocked by this as the claims ranged from replacing the carpet (and cleaning it!?!) to a small washing up bowl that was apparently missing (it wasn't).
The majority claims were absurd minus some acceptable wear and tear to paint/walls + new bulbs which we could accept. Absurd mainly because you could see the same "damage" on the check-in report! It was so unprofessional and frankly embarrassing of C&W to give the landlord this platform to ultimately fail following the TDA review from which we got £1152 back.
Unfortunately if you got this far in the review (well done!) I ran out of words to go into detail, but I would seriously avoid C&W where you can! We are just glad this ordeal is over, we've got our deposit, and we hopefully never have to engage with the C&W letting/property management team again.